Friday, 5 July 2013

More courts to deal with women, children cases: CJI-designate



        
New Delhi, Jul 5 (PTI) In a bid to clear the huge backlog of cases, the Chief Justice of India-designate Justice P Sathasivam plans to put in place special courts to deal with the cases relating to offences against women, children and
compensation claims.  

"The cases pertaining to offences against women and children will be given priority and more special courts should be set up across the country to deal with them," says the
judge, who will take over as the 40th CJI on July 19.


        Justice Sathasivam, who did not consider the pendency of
cases as "alarming", however, expressed concern over the fact
that crimes against women are increasing.

        He feels the issue can be effectively tackled by setting
up more courts for women and children, besides the
compensation matters, as they constitute one-third of total
pending litigations.

        "We have already identified the areas in which the courts
have to concentrate and in association with the Government of
India. We have constituted and are going to press for more
separate courts for women and children, juvenile justice and
matter relating to compensation either under Land Acquisition
Act or Workmen Compensation Act," the CJI-designate.
 
        Over three crore cases are pending in various courts
across the country, according to information provided by the
government in Parliament earlier this year.

        Responding to a query as to which issue he would accord
priority as the CJI, Justice Sathasivam said, "According to
me, the pendency of litigations all over India starting from
subordinate courts and ending with the apex court is the first
priority."

        He said, "If separate courts are constituted for these
two branches, one for women and children and another for the
compensation matters, pertaining to Land Acquisition, Motor
actions cases, and compensation, these will take away
one-third of the arrears from main pendency."

         The CJI-designate said that he will continue with
practise of his predecessors in the apex court to accord
primacy to cases pertaining to women and children, the life
sentence matters, and the accused who are in jail.

        "In the same way, we are requesting the High Courts also.
Many High Courts have already started this method and the
subordinate courts also. On the basis of our requests, High
Courts have issued directions to all the district judges to
give priority to these type of matters, old cases and senior
citizens' cases," he said.

        The judge also stressed that the matters relating to
award of compensation be segregated from other conventional
cases. (More) PTI HMP SJK AAC RKS VSC

"See, the victims, the affected parties must get their
compensation soon. So for this, litigations have to be
segregated from the other conventional litigations and the
courts have to give priority to such cases.

        "We are asking the courts to concentrate only on these
cases till they hear and decide a certain numbers of cases,"
Justice Sathasivam said.

        He also gave various reasons for increasing number of
pending cases in courts across the country.

        "As far as pendency is concerned, no I won't say it is
alarming, it is welcome, because you know that now India has
developed much and is developing more international relations,
many companies are coming (here), and definitely many
litigations will also follow...," he said.
 
        Apart from this, various new laws such as the Domestic
Violence Act, the Negotiable Instruments Act have led to
filing of "lakhs of cases" in the country, Justice Sathasivam
said.
        The judge also cited the increased awareness, matrimonial
disputes and the proximity to the apex court as reasons for
increase in the pending litigations.

        "The main thing is more awareness and many new
legislations. If I want to say in one sentence, it is more
awareness among the citizens. In those days, normally people
were satisfied with some order of the government or lower
level judiciary. Now they want to take the matters up to the
SupremeCourt," he said.

No comments:

Post a Comment